Vaccination Programs: Requirements for Child Care, School, and College Attendance
Findings and Recommendations
The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recommends vaccination requirements for child care, school, and college attendance to increase vaccination rates and decrease rates of vaccine-preventable disease.
The full CPSTF Finding and Rationale Statement and supporting documents for Vaccination Programs: Requirements for Child Care, School, and College Attendance are available in The Community Guide Collection on CDC Stacks.
Intervention
Vaccination requirements are laws or policies requiring anyone attending child care, school, or college to be vaccinated or provide other documentation of immunity. State legislatures may enact statutes specifying required vaccinations or health or education departments may adopt administrative rules.
Institutions such as colleges and private schools may establish additional vaccination policies. Vaccination requirements vary across jurisdictions by comprehensiveness, acceptable documentation of immunity, access to exemptions (especially nonmedical exemptions), and type and consistency of enforcement.
About The Systematic Review
The CPSTF finding is based on evidence from 32 studies (search period January 1980-July 2015). The finding updates and replaces the 2009 finding for Vaccination Requirements for Child Care, School, and College Attendance.
Study Characteristics
- Studies conducted as cross-sectional assessments (10), time series (5), before-after assessments (8), retrospective cohort (3), posttest only (2), and case control (1)
- Common limitations affecting this body of evidence were differences in measurement of change in outcomes and confounding by secular trends or community characteristics
- Ten studies examined effectiveness on vaccine-preventable disease rates or associated morbidity; five were nationwide assessments
- Mostly conducted in United States (30 studies) and examined school entry requirements (24 studies)
- Examined evidence for children and adolescents attending child care (6), primary school (11), middle/high school (13), or college (1)
- Examined changes for measles-mumps-rubella (16), tetanus (8), pertussis (8), varicella (8), Haemophilus influenza type b (5), hepatitis A (2), hepatitis B (14), meningococcal disease (3), influenza (2), and human papillomavirus (1)
Summary of Results
Thirty-two studies were included.
- Overall vaccination rates increased by a median of 18 percentage points (17 studies with 24 study arms)
- Five additional studies examined vaccination outcomes that could not be included in summary estimate; results generally favorable
- Incidence of measles and mumps was lower in U.S. states with immunization requirements for school-aged children, and low-incidence areas were more likely to enforce school entry laws and prevent non-compliant children from attending (3 studies)
Summary of Economic Evidence
Two studies provided information about cost and economic benefit. One considered Hepatitis B, the other Varicella.
- Estimated cost included only vaccines and administration; economic benefits based on healthcare costs avoided
- Both studies found economic benefits exceeded costs based on partial analyses
Applicability
Evidence applicable to range of vaccinations recommended for children and adolescents attending child care, primary school, middle school, high school, or college.
Evidence Gaps
- How effective are requirements for child care attendance and college residency?
- Are estimates of risk for vaccine-preventable disease similar when individual vaccination and exemption records are used to determine vaccination coverage in the school or community?
- What are the relationships between variations in school or child care documentation, enforcement, and vaccination and exemption rates?
- What are barriers to school and local enforcement, and how can they be overcome?
- What factors facilitate or impede the adoption and enforcement of vaccination requirements in child care and college settings?
- How do changes in vaccination requirements effect rates of vaccination, exemption, and enrollment?
- What are the economic costs and benefits of vaccination requirements in different settings?
Implementation Considerations and Resources
State vaccination requirements allow medical exemptions and may allow nonmedical exemptions for religious reasons or philosophic beliefs.
Updated information on vaccination requirements for each state and setting are available from the Immunization Action Coalition.
Three important aspects have potential to meaningfully influence vaccination rates and risk for vaccine-preventable disease:
- Geographic clustering of under-immunization
- Inconsistent enforcement of requirements
- Relative ease of obtaining nonmedical exemptions
Practices to reduce nonmedical exemptions: strengthen rigor of exemption application process, increase submission frequency, implement clear and consistent enforcement and monitoring.
Requirements should complement ongoing provider outreach and public education to increase demand and access to services.
Findings from two studies suggest requirements may reduce health disparities by improving rates among racial and ethnic minorities and children in low-income communities.
No harms were associated with vaccination requirements.
Crosswalks
Healthy People 2030 includes the following objectives related to this CPSTF recommendation.
- Reduce the proportion of children who get no recommended vaccines by age 2 years — IID‑02
- Maintain the vaccination coverage level of 1 dose of the MMR vaccine in children by age 2 years — IID‑03
- Maintain the vaccination coverage level of 2 doses of the MMR vaccine for children in kindergarten — IID‑04
- Increase the coverage level of 4 doses of the DTaP vaccine in children by age 2 years — IID‑06
- Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year — IID‑09
- Increase the proportion of adults age 19 years or older who get recommended vaccines — IID‑D03