Physical Activity: Social Support Interventions in Community Settings

The CPSTF finding is based on evidence from a systematic review of 9 studies (search period 1980 – 2000).

The review was conducted on behalf of the CPSTF by a team of specialists in systematic review methods, and in research, practice, and policy related to increasing physical activity.

There is no information for this section.

More details about study results are available in the published evidence review [PDF - 3.14 MB].

Nine studies were included in the review.

• All studies found interventions were effective in getting people to be more physically active, as measured by various indicators (e.g., blocks walked or flights of stairs climbed daily, frequency of attending exercise sessions, or minutes spent in physical activity).
  • Time spent being physically active: median increase of 44.2% (5 study arms)
  • Frequency of physical activity: median increase of 19.6% (6 study arms)
  • Aerobic capacity: median net increase in of 4.7% (5 study arms)
• One study found that those who received more frequent support were more active than those who received less frequent support, although both highly structured and less formal support were equally effective.
• Interventions improved participants’ fitness levels, lowered their percentage of body fat, increased their knowledge about exercise, and improved their confidence in their ability to exercise.

An economic review of this intervention did not find any relevant studies.

Results should be applicable to diverse settings and populations provided interventions are adapted to target populations.

Additional research and evaluation are needed to answer the following questions and fill existing gaps in the evidence base. (What are evidence gaps?)

• What type of social support and which media work for which people?
• Do intensity and structure of the support make a difference?
• How does effect size vary by how often people interact?
• What are the effects of each intervention in various sociodemographic subgroups, such as age, gender, race, or ethnicity?
• Do informational approaches to increasing physical activity increase health knowledge? To increase physical activity levels, are increased knowledge or improved attitudes toward physical activity needed?
• Do these approaches to increasing physical activity increase awareness of opportunities for, and benefits of, physical activity?
• After the initial behavior change, what are the most effective ways to maintain physical activity levels?
• Are there other benefits from an intervention that might enhance its acceptability? For example, is increasing social support for physical activity reflected in an overall greater sense of community?
• Are there any key harms?
• Is anything known about whether or how approaches to physical activity could reduce potential harms (e.g., injuries or other problems associated with doing too much too fast)?
• Can reliable and valid measures be developed to address the entire spectrum of physical activity, including light or moderate activity?
• Are these interventions cost effective?
• How can effectiveness in terms of health outcomes or quality-adjusted health outcomes be better measured, estimated, or modeled?
• How can the cost–benefit of these programs be estimated?
• How do specific characteristics of these interventions contribute to economic efficiency?
• What combinations of components in multicomponent interventions are most cost-effective?
• What are the physical or structural (environmental) barriers to implementing these interventions?
• What resource (time and money) constraints slow or stop the implementation of these interventions?

• In most studies, volunteers were grouped to provide companionship and support to help each other reach self-selected activity goals. Participants received phone calls from each other and from study staff to monitor progress and encourage continued activity.
• Some studies involved formal discussion groups to address barriers to exercise and negative perceptions about activity.
• Studies were conducted in the United States (7 studies), Canada (1 study), and Australia (1 study).
• Studies were offered in community settings, including community centers and churches (6 studies), a worksite (1 study), and a university (2 studies).
• Six studies exclusively or primarily reported results for women; three studies included men and women.
• Study populations for most studies were middle-aged; one study included women aged 18 years or older, and one study focused on women aged 50 to 65 years.
• Three studies restricted their populations to people who were sedentary at the beginning of the study; the rest included people at any initial level of activity.