COVID-19 is a rapidly evolving situation. When working in different community settings, follow CDC guidance External Web Site Icon to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. Visit www.cdc.gov/coronavirus External Web Site Icon for the latest public health information.

Violence Prevention: Therapeutic Foster Care – for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbance

Tabs

What the CPSTF Found

About The Systematic Review

The CPSTF finding is based on evidence from a systematic review of 2 studies (search period through December 2001). The review was conducted on behalf of the CPSTF by a team of specialists in systematic review methods, and in research, practice, and policy related to violence prevention.

Context

In both types of therapeutic foster care, participants are:

  • Placed for several months in foster families who are specially trained and compensated for their work
  • Provided a structured environment where they are rewarded for positive social behavior and penalized for disruptive and aggressive behavior
  • Separated from their delinquent or troublesome peers and provided close supervision at school and at home

Summary of Results

Detailed results from the systematic review are available in the CPSTF finding pdf icon [PDF - 132 KB].

Two studies qualified for the systematic review of cluster therapeutic foster care for the reduction of violence by children with severe emotional disturbance.

  • One study compared a cluster therapeutic foster care intervention (called a parent-therapist program) to group residence for the treatment of SED among youths aged 6-12 years.
    • Change in conduct disorders: 31.3% increase for girls and a negligible effect (a 0.2% decrease) for boys
  • The other study reported effects of New York State's version of cluster therapeutic foster care, Family-Based Treatment, on children aged 6-13 years with severe emotional disturbance.
    • Change in externalizing behavior among children: increase of 2.5%

Summary of Economic Evidence

An economic review of this intervention was not conducted because the CPSTF did not have enough information to determine if the intervention works.

Applicability

Applicability of this intervention across different settings and populations was not assessed because the CPSTF did not have enough information to determine if the intervention works.

Evidence Gaps

The CPSTF identified several areas that have limited information. Additional research and evaluation could help fill remaining gaps in the evidence base. (What are evidence gaps?)

Effectiveness of Cluster Therapeutic Foster Care for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbance

Evidence on the effects of cluster therapeutic foster care for pre-adolescent children with severe emotional disturbance was insufficient to determine their effectiveness (for the reduction of violence). Only two studies of this form of therapeutic foster care assessed violent outcomes. The studies we reviewed suggest either no effect or, for girls, possible harm. Further research on the effectiveness of therapeutic foster care with this and other child and adolescent populations would clarify other possible benefits (or harms) of this intervention. Follow-up studies should determine short-term as well as long-term effects.

Applicability

The effectiveness of therapeutic foster care among female populations is less clear than for males. The effects of therapeutic foster care may vary by gender, indicating a need to modify programs to accommodate such differences.

Of the studies assessed in our review, most did not include information on the race or ethnicity of participants. Of those that did provide such information, the majority of participants were white. It is still unclear whether other racial or ethnic populations would benefit as did the populations studied, and whether modifications of the intervention, (e.g., employing foster parents of the same ethnicity as the youth in the program), would enhance success for these populations.

More research is needed to determine effectiveness among children with severe emotional disturbance and among other populations, such as mentally retarded children, children who have been sexually abused, and children with AIDS, for whom foster care may be a viable alternative to other treatment options (Eddy & Chamberlain, 2000; Aos et al., 2001; Dennis, 1992).

Other Positive or Negative Effects

As noted, this review did not systematically summarize evidence of the effectiveness of therapeutic foster care programs on nonviolent outcomes. Such outcomes might include school achievement; truancy; substance abuse; sexual activity; social skills; psychological adjustment; stability of home environment; and nonviolent delinquency, such as running away, theft, weapon carrying, and property crimes.

In general, the research questions for these outcomes are similar to the research questions raised above for violent outcomes. An additional question is: What are the benefits (and harms) to foster families, schools and communities?

Economic Evaluations

The available economic evidence was limited. Considerable research is warranted on the following questions:

  • What is the cost-effectiveness of the various alternative therapeutic foster care programs?
  • How can effectiveness in terms of health outcomes or quality-adjusted health outcomes be better measured, estimated, or modeled?
  • How can the cost benefit of this program be estimated from a societal perspective?
  • How do specific characteristics of this approach contribute to economic efficiency?
  • How does program intensity affect the outcome and cost-effectiveness of the intervention?

Barriers

Several important barriers may adversely affect implementation and outcomes of therapeutic foster care programs. Addressing the following research questions may help to avoid or overcome these barriers:

  • What design characteristics of therapeutic foster care programs improve the work satisfaction and retention of foster parents? Characteristics to assess include the selection process, training, ongoing support, respite care, and compensation.
  • What features of service systems are essential for efficient implementation and sustainability of therapeutic foster care programs?
  • What is the minimum level of services and communications infrastructure needed to support adequate supervision of foster families?
  • What combination of community characteristics provides optimal community readiness for implementation and sustainability of therapeutic foster care programs?

References

Aos S, Phipps P, Barnoski R, Lieb R. The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime. Olympia WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 2001.

Dennis KW. STAR—Specialized Team for AIDS Relief: a therapeutic foster care program for children with AIDS. Community Alternatives Int J Fam Care 1992;4:269–80.

Eddy JM, Chamberlain P. Family management and deviant peer association as mediators of the impact of treatment condition on youth antisocial behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:857–63.

Study Characteristics

  • In the evaluated interventions, program personnel provided guidance to clusters of five foster parent families who cooperated in the care of five children (aged 5 to 13 years) with severe emotional disturbance.
  • In one of the studies, children were referred by mental health, social service, and school personnel or parents. In the other study, the source of referral was unclear.
  • Programs were of relatively longer duration, with an average length of 18 months.

Publications