Analytic Framework [PDF - 2.90 MB] - See Figure 2 on page 52
When starting an effectiveness review, the systematic review team develops an analytic framework. The analytic framework illustrates how the intervention approach is thought to affect public health. It guides the search for evidence and may be used to summarize the evidence collected. The analytic framework often includes intermediate outcomes, potential effect modifiers, potential harms, and potential additional benefits.
The number of studies and publications do not always correspond (e.g., a publication may include several studies or one study may be explained in several publications).
Abt Associates. Participation and benefits in the urban Section 8 program: new construction and existing housing (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., 1981.
Atkinson R, Hamilton W, Myers D. Economic and racial/ethnic concentration in the housing allowance demand experiment. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., 1980.
Katz LF, Kling JR, Liebman JB. Moving to Opportunity in Boston: early results of a randomized mobility experiment. Working Paper No. 441. 2000. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/_kling/mto/. Accessed July 12, 2002.
Katz LF, Kling JR, Liebman JB. The early impacts of Moving to Opportunity in Boston: final report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2000. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/~kling/mto/. Accessed June 20, 2002.
Kaufman JE. Low-income black youth in white suburbs: education and employment outcomes. [Dissertation]. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 1991.
Kennedy SD. Housing Allowance Demand Experiment: final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., 1980.
Kennedy SD, Finkel M. Section 8 rental voucher and rental certificate utilization study: final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1994.
Leger ML, Kennedy SD. Final comprehensive report of the freestanding housing voucher demonstration (2 vols). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., 1990.
Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Moving to Opportunity: what about the kids? 2000. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/_kling/mto/. Accessed June 20, 2002.
Ludwig J, Duncan GJ, Pinkston JC. Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. 2000. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/_kling/mto/. Accessed July 12, 2002.
Ludwig J, Duncan GJ, Hirschfield P. Urban poverty and juvenile crime: evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. JCPR Working paper 158. 2000. Available at: www.jcpr.org/wp/wpprofile.cfm?id_162. Accessed July 12, 2002.
Meaden PM. Social integration and self-esteem outcomes among low income black adolescents in middle-class white suburbs [Dissertation]. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 1993.
Peroff KA, Davis CL, Jones R, Curtin RT, Marans RW. Gautreaux housing demonstration: an evaluation of its impact on participating households. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Division of Policy Studies, 1979.
Pettit B, McLanahan S, Hanratty M. Moving to Opportunity: benefits and hidden costs. Working Paper 98-11. 2000. www.wws.princeton.edu/~kling/mto/. Accessed June 20, 2002.
Popkin S, Rosenbaum J, Meaden P. Labor market experiences of lowincome black women in middle-class suburbs: evidence from a survey of Gautreaux program participants. J Policy Anal Manage 1993;12:556–73.
Rosenbaum E, Harris LE. Low-income families in their new neighborhoods: the short-term effects of moving from Chicago’s public housing. 2000. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/~kling/mto/chicago. Accessed June 20, 2002.
Rosenbaum E, Harris LE. Residential mobility and opportunities: early impacts of the Moving to Opportunity demonstration program in Chicago. 2000. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/_kling/mto/. Accessed June 20, 2002.
Rosenbaum J, Popkin SJ. Economic and social impacts of housing integration. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 1990.
Rosenbaum JE, Kulieke MJ, Rubinowitz LS. Low-income black children in white suburban schools: a study of school and student responses. J Negro Educ 1987;56:35–43.
Rosenbaum JE, Popkin SJ. Employment and earnings of low-income blacks who move to middle-class suburbs. In: Jencks C, Peterson PE, eds. The urban underclass. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1991;342–56.
Rosenbaum JE, Popkin SJ, Kaufman JE, Rusin J. Social integration of low-income black adults in middle-class white suburbs. Social Problems 1991;38:448–61.
Rusin-White J. Self-efficacy, residential integration and attainment in Gautreaux families: a longitudinal study [Dissertation]. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 1993.
Solomon AP, Fenton CG. The nation’s first experience with housing allowances: the Kansas City demonstration. Working Paper No. 23. Joint Center for Urban Studies of MIT and Harvard University, 1973.
The following outlines the search strategy used for these reviews of housing interventions to promote health equity: Mixed-Income Housing Developments; Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Programs.
Searches for mixed-income housing developments and tenant-based rental assistance programs were conducted in 10 computerized databases: Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO Information Services’ Academic Search™ Elite, HUD User Bibliographic Database, MarciveWeb Catalogue of U.S. Government Publications, ProQuest Dissertations, ProQuest General Research Databases, PsychInfo, Public Affairs Information Services, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Sociological Abstracts. Internet resources were examined, as were reference lists of reviewed articles and referrals from specialists in the field. To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to:
- Document an evaluation of a mixed-income housing development or a tenant-based rental assistance program for families within the United States
- Be published in English between 1965 and 2000
- Compare outcomes among groups of people exposed to the intervention with outcomes among groups of people not exposed or less exposed to the intervention (whether the comparison was concurrent between groups or before-and-after within groups); and measure outcomes defined by the analytic framework for the intervention