Skip directly to search Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
The Community Guide Home Page

Cancer Prevention & Control, Client-Oriented Screening Interventions: Reducing Out-of-Pocket Costs

Interventions to reduce client out-of-pocket costs attempt to minimize or remove economic barriers that make it difficult for clients to access cancer screening services. Costs can be reduced through a variety of approaches, including vouchers, reimbursements, reduction in co-pays, or adjustments in federal or state insurance coverage. Efforts to reduce client costs may be combined with measures to provide client education, information about program availability, or measures to reduce structural barriers.


Summary of Task Force Recommendations & Findings

The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends reducing client out-of-pocket costs for breast cancer screening on the basis of sufficient evidence of effectiveness in increasing screening for breast cancer.

The Task Force finds insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of reducing out-of-pocket costs in increasing screening for cervical or colorectal cancer because too few (cervical cancer) or no (colorectal cancer) studies were identified. Nonetheless, the consistent favorable results for interventions that reduce costs for breast cancer screening and several other preventive services suggest that such interventions are likely to be effective for increasing cervical and colorectal cancer screening as well.

Task Force Finding & Rationale Statement


Results from the Systematic Reviews


The Task Force findings are based on evidence from a previously completed review (search period 1966-2004) and an updated review (search period 2004-2008). Updates of reviews are conducted to incorporate more recent evidence.


Read a summary of findings from the previous review or visit the Cancer Prevention and Control section of our publications page to access the complete articles.



Breast Cancer


Eight studies qualified for the original systematic review; no new studies were identified for the update.

  • Mammography screening: median increase of 11.5 percentage points (interquartile interval [IQI]: 6.0-28.5; 8 studies).
  • Six studies evaluated the extension of Medicare or state benefits to cover periodic mammography and two assessed the use of free client vouchers.

Findings should be applicable to various populations and settings in which people would accept screening but have limited financial resources.


image of planetFind a Research-Tested Intervention Program (RTIP) about reducing out-of-pocket costs to increase breast External Web Site Icon cancer screening (What is an RTIP?).



Cervical Cancer


One study qualified for the original systematic review; no new studies were identified for the update.

  • Pap tests: reported increase of 17 percentage points


Colorectal Cancer


No studies qualified for the review.


These findings were based on a systematic review of all available studies, conducted on behalf of the Task Force by a team of specialists in systematic review methods, and in research, practice and policy related to cancer prevention and control.



Publications


More Community Guide publications about Cancer Prevention and Control, including articles for the original review.






Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions on this page are those of the Community Preventive Services Task Force and do not necessarily represent those of CDC.

Sample Citation

The content of publications of the Guide to Community Preventive Services is in the public domain. Citation as to source, however, is appreciated. Sample citation:
Guide to Community Preventive Services. Cancer prevention & control, client-oriented screening interventions: reducing out-of-pocket costs. www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer/screening/client-oriented/ReducingOutOfPocketCosts.html. Last updated: MM/DD/YYYY.

Review completed: October 2009

JavaScript must be enabled to use the Text Sizer function.

image of planet What are RTIPs and why consider them?

More

Partners

P.L.A.N.E.T.

Contact Us:
  • Community Guide Branch
    Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office (EAPO)
    Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Road NE
    Mailstop E-69
    Atlanta, GA 30333
  • Community Guide
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
The Community Guide Branch, Epidemiology Analysis Program Office (EAPO), Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop E-69, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A. communityguide@cdc.gov