Skip directly to search Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
The Community Guide Home Page

Cancer Prevention & Control, Client-Oriented Screening Interventions: Mass Media

Mass media—including television, radio, newspapers, magazines, and billboards—are used to communicate educational and motivational information about cancer screening. Mass media can be used alone, but almost always include other components (e.g., client reminders) or attempt to capitalize on existing interventions and infrastructure. This review evaluated the effectiveness of mass media when used alone, or its unique contribution when used as part of a multicomponent intervention to increase screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers.

Summary of Task Force Recommendations & Findings


The Community Preventive Services Task Force finds insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of mass media interventions in increasing screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers because too few studies qualified for the review.

Task Force Finding & Rationale Statement


Results from the Systematic Reviews


The Task Force findings are based on evidence from a previously completed review (search period 1966-2004) and an updated review (search period 2004-2008). Updates of reviews are conducted to incorporate more recent evidence.

Read a summary of findings from the previous review or visit the Cancer Prevention and Control section of our publications page to access the complete articles.


Breast Cancer


Two studies qualified for the systematic review; their findings were inconsistent.

  • In Australia, radio and newspaper advertisements targeted Italian-speaking women.
    • Among women in their fifties, completed mammograms decreased by 16.1% for initial screens and 4.2% for following screens.
    • Among women in their sixties, completed mammograms decreased by 10.8% for initial screens and increased by 9.0% for subsequent screens.
  • A multicomponent intervention aimed at African-American women included a higher or lower intensity mass media component. When compared with the lower intensity component, the higher intensity program showed:
    • A decrease of 2.4 percentage points for mammography
    • An increase of 4.2 percentage points for clinical breast exams
    • Neither change was statistically significant


Cervical Cancer


Three studies qualified for the systematic review.

  • Effects from all three studies were in the favorable direction, but only one reported absolute changes in screening (an increase of 4.7 percentage points).

Colorectal Cancer


One study qualified for the systematic review.

  • This study examined the effect of higher vs. lower intensity mass media as part of a multicomponent intervention.
  • Screening by FOBT: decreased by 4.7 percentage points
  • Screening by protoscopy: decreased by 8.0 percentage points



These findings were based on a systematic review of all available studies, conducted on behalf of the Task Force by a team of specialists in systematic review methods, and in research, practice and policy related to cancer prevention and control.



Publications


More Community Guide publications about Cancer Prevention and Control, including articles for the original review.




Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions on this page are those of the Community Preventive Services Task Force and do not necessarily represent those of CDC.

Sample Citation

The content of publications of the Guide to Community Preventive Services is in the public domain. Citation as to source, however, is appreciated. Sample citation:
Guide to Community Preventive Services. Cancer prevention & control, client-oriented screening interventions: mass media. www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer/screening/client-oriented/MassMedia.html. Last updated: MM/DD/YYYY.

Review completed: October 2009

JavaScript must be enabled to use the Text Sizer function.

Contact Us:
  • Community Guide Branch
    Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office (EAPO)
    Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Road NE
    Mailstop E-69
    Atlanta, GA 30333
  • Community Guide
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
The Community Guide Branch, Epidemiology Analysis Program Office (EAPO), Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop E-69, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A. communityguide@cdc.gov