Community Guide logo
The Community Guide -- What Works to Promote Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
   
  Topics
bullet Alcohol
bullet Cancer
bullet Diabetes
bullet Mental Health
bullet Motor Vehicle
bullet Nutrition
bullet Obesity
bullet Oral Health
bullet Physical Activity
bullet Pregnancy
bullet Sexual Behavior
bullet Social Environment
bullet Tobacco
bullet Vaccines
bullet Violence
bullet Worksite

Cancer > Cancer Screening > Improving the Use of Screening

Improving the Use of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening

Recommendations

Screening procedures are effective in detecting breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer at early stages and, combined with appropriate treatment, are likely to reduce mortality. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends regular breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The Guide to Community Preventive Services identifies population-based and health system-based interventions that are effective in promoting increased use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The goal is to help practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and research funders identify effective strategies for increasing screening and to highlight gaps in the research where additional questions need to be answered.

Summary of Findings

The independent Task Force on Community Preventive Services examined the effectiveness of two broad categories of interventions:
  1. client-based interventions, and
  2. provider-oriented interventions.

Within the category of client-based interventions, they studied interventions that aim to:

    1. increase community demand for screening, or
    2. increase community access to screening.

The Task Force considered client-based interventions separately for the three cancer sites (breast, cervical, and colorectal) because the clients for each of these screening tests can be very different. The Task Force considered provider-oriented interventions across all three sites, however, because providers might be influenced by similar factors when deciding whether to recommend screening for their various clients.

The following table lists current Task Force findings specific to interventions for increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal screening. The Task Force based these recommendations on their assessment of the strength of published evidence as to whether these interventions are effective. The evidence they examined resulted from systematic reviews of scientific articles that was conducted for the Task Force by a team of scientists and other experts.

A finding of “insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness” does NOT mean that the intervention doesn’t work, but, rather, that additional research is needed to determine whether or not the intervention is effective.


Task Force Findings for Cancer Screening Interventions

Client-based Interventions
Community Demand Breast Cervical Colorectal
Client reminder Recommended Recommended Recommended
Client incentive Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence
Mass media Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence
Small media Recommended Recommended Recommended
Group education Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence
One-on-one education Recommended Recommended Insufficient Evidence
Community Access      
Reducing structural barrier Recommended Insufficient Evidence Recommended
Reducing out-of-pocket expense Recommended Insufficient Evidence Insufficient Evidence
Provider-oriented Interventions
Provider reminder Recommended
Provider assessment and feedback Recommended
Provider incentive Insufficient Evidence
Multicomponent Interventions
Multicomponent interventions Recommended

How to Use These Findings

  • The Community Guide identifies interventions to increase cancer screening that have been recommended by the Task Force based on evidence of effectiveness. The Community Guide Web site also links to Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T.  This National Cancer Institute Web site provides examples of programs that use these effective interventions along with related “how to” materials. Public health program planning tools may also be helpful in determining how these evidence-based recommendations fit with your local needs, goals, and constraints.

  • Researchers, as well as those who fund research, can benefit from the research gaps identified in each review as important areas for additional study. These gaps may include interventions for which there is insufficient evidence of effectiveness to date, or groups for whom effectiveness of the intervention has not been adequately studied. Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. can also help you locate others who might be interested in conducting such research.   

The Guide to Community Preventive Services is an ever-expanding resource for recommendations on evidence-based interventions to improve public health, including preventing and controlling diseases, injuries, and other health-related conditions. For more information about the Community Guide (including links to publications and a variety of resources) see www.thecommunityguide.org and for more information about the cancer reviews, visit www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer/.

This information is in the public domain. Copying and disseminating freely is encouraged. However, citation to source is appreciated.

 


 Search The Community Guide
divider
On this page
bullet Background
bullet Review Findings
bullet How to Use Findings
Partners

Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T.

 
Contact Information
Community Guide Branch
National Center for Health Marketing (NCHM)
Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road NE
Mailstop E-69
Atlanta, GA 30333
E-mail:
communityguide@cdc.gov
Page last updated:

The Community Guide is sponsored by the CDC's National Center for Health Marketing and the Community Guide Partners.